Christophe Gans is trying to combine a fabulous convention and historical realities of the XVIII century, without relying at recreating all the familiar story, perhaps, nothing and no one else, until a certain time and making all morality in the film is too fragile and ephemeral. The main result of the new “Beauty and the Beast” in essence becomes a fact that the film seems to be completely out of the genre, not having truly attractive proportion of bright fairytale narrative, not solid historicism (all historical and social aspect in the film enjoyed a very superficial), which would be compensated complete absence in the film unshakable and enduring sincerity. And in fact through the film permeates only one single sound idea that the love of monsters still required, even if it is only the love of convenience.
The first vampire who gave the initial impetus to the eternal theme of immortality vampirism. You know, the theme of vampires for me has always been relevant and interesting, because in the late 19th century writer with a brilliant imagination to create a creature that does not know how to grow old, to be forever young and beautiful, but lives at the expense of the lives of others by drinking their blood. For me has always been interesting to watch as the man who became an immortal monster forced to eat other people’s lives, will behave. How much has already been filmed on the subject of movies? Hard to say, now the genre is at the pinnacle of success and is incredibly popular in general, turned out a great movie with an interesting plot and intriguing characters are well spelled out, except for a few. So far this is the best film about Dracula that I’ve ever seen.
The plot in the first half of the picture read, but more what happens is that it did not fit. The promise of this is given in the beginning of the film, but it does not attach importance in the process of watching a movie about it, I had forgotten – so I tightened the story. And here, I must say, hiding one thing that prevented me to put the film the highest rating. Just the first half of the film, albeit with a readable story, but shot so powerful and heartfelt, with such attention to detail and with such a strong feeling that it simply can not leave the viewer indifferent. But then, in my opinion, one storyline is interrupted and another begins. Even if it is linked to the end of the film, but still it looks somewhat aloof. And for such an eventuality, I was not ready. It seemed to me that the emotion at the end of the film was less and sensuality was also less. It seems the filmmakers did not consider that the audience give everything for the first storyline, and the second may not be enough of us. Perhaps the thing in the game Jennifer Connelly and Ripley.
Decision to base the story biblical story is a very bold and ambitious. But the writers, in my opinion, acted very competently. betraying not a literal retelling, but rather a variation on the theme of the Flood. Do not expect from the picture following the canons of the genre, which were laid at the dawn of cinema. This film is different slant fantasy rather than a historical genre. Really liked the fact that the film seriously affected by the problem of the survival of the human race, and in the course of the narrative put quite a logical question: how reasonable saving a species which is so prone to parasitism and self-destruction? The question is really hard, but the writers quite gracefully beat it and add a conflict between belief in the depravity of mankind Noah and his wife’s charity, accustomed to see the best in people. And the outcome of this conflict, I personally liked.
«Do not censure other people, and they will not censure you». It is replete with this slogan and this film perfectly captures not only the content of the picture itself, but also a surprising sympathy regarding the distribution of this painting. After all, even with the rather stringent claims by critics, the film gained a special love for ordinary spectators. Moreover, it turned out, than something more than just another picture about the American family values and that is what makes this film directed by David Dobkin is probably the main and most unexpected surprise of the year. After all, expecting to see another film little distinguishable from their fellow genre, even when viewing the image in front of me drew perhaps one of the most powerful dramas of the year.The judge a rare and unexpected example of what a movie in our time really may not forgotten how to amaze. Since expecting to see another movie about the problem of “fathers and children,” I found something much more profound, interesting and personal. That certainly fixed workshop in acting, directing and decent very strong script.
The film allows us to plunge into the atmosphere of the future and the inevitable decline of humanity (but hope always springs eternal). In doing so, we help to expensive scenery, beautiful special effects, competent supply scenario and successful selection of actors. Cruise joins the hero to help the woman, whose nickname “fullmetal bitch” .In the film you will not see outrageous game of actors, but this game will be enough to have time to migrate to the main characters, to feel their power and solidarity in the hope of saving the world. You will not leave indifferent neither one step protagonists: with each victory you will be happy with every encountered in the problem – experience. Quality fiction with all your favorite Tom Cruise, literate script, humor, emotions and beautiful ekshenom.Esli you are not indifferent to the fiction that after watching the leaves not only colorful special effects, but also touches something inside you.
In recent years, there is a feeling that the movie about the war everybody forgotten how to shoot. It gets pretentious, stupid and unprincipled. The war is coming to an end, the Germans desperately mobilized his last strength, despite the close defeat. At this very moment the commander Don Collier loses a member of his crew, and the replacement gets youngster, who came to the war, we can say casually. It is obvious that such a turn indicates that now his crew became even more vulnerable. David Ayer took a very complex subject and directed the movie is not about the coolness of the American army, and the people in the war. Get a place snobbish, but very real. Great battle scenes involving these tanks look just great, very vividly and honestly. The scene of fighting interspersed with interesting dialogue about the nature of the soldiers on both sides, about their expectations, their simple joys rare at the front. This movie is about the commander’s responsibility to subordinates, the cruelty of war, animal laws. And yet it’s about the fact that even in war there is a place of compassion and mercy. I am not afraid of such a comparison, the best movie about World War II from the time of “Saving Private Ryan.” Great movie.
The film is very bright. Magnificent views of the island is fascinating and somehow does not fit that in such a beautiful place can be such a terrible thing. It’s great to put fights and fights and all character Ava is a strong and courageous fighter. The only thing that is probably a little confused, because this is something that still Ava girl, not a woman-warrior, and in some places one would do gentler but still it has to itself and causes only positive emotions. And a little disappointed her husband Derek. Sometimes wanted to shout: Derek, you’re still the man! «In the Blood» in the end, turned out to be very dynamic, exciting and colorful film. About it can not be said that this is a typical dumb action movie. Watching a picture of the most important and interesting not boring. I’m not a fan of fighters, but I liked the movie.
The film is divided into just some components: the aesthetic (visual) and drama, all the rest does not matter, any quibbles about the plausibility of the technical component of the film, I think inappropriate, as I have throughout the view there is only one, and it relates more The above-mentioned to the visual component was estimated at great! So the visual part of the film – excellent, never a cheap graphics, thanks to a local event, the director was able to effectively implement all the means given to him. The dramatic part is also very, very well represented the family of Alex frequent occurrence in the frame, the scene in which the show all that is left of it and mixing with human robotics at the level of emotions, memories. In conclusion, I support the comments said earlier, “Everyone would be a remake of the classics” will be hoping that this is just the beginning of the franchise!
In general, as the saying goes, all new long-forgotten old. Action in the best traditions of the genre, but with a new idea. Toward the end of the film has gone beyond the aircraft, and fans cool special effects finally saw what awaited. This confirmed the film belongs to a large cinema. In the «Non-Stop» had experience for the whole crew, but the attention was focused on the main character. And he deserves it. Recalling his feelings in the theater two hours ago, I realize that I never do not shaking while watching a movie. Pressed in a chair, I just bounced from heating up tension. Questions swarming in my head, carrying the brain to shreds. Whom to believe? Who is to blame? How can quietly kill someone on the plane? Why substitute marshal at all levels? The brain is working feverishly throughout the timing, but the director skillfully plays with the audience in a cat-and-mouse, giving them the opportunity to build some speculation that then spread speculation built into pieces.
