“Rio, I love you” was a continuation of the popular series of films “Paris, I love you” and “New York, I love you.” This project has taken a large number of stars in the Brazilian and American cinemas. We can see ten different stories about the most beautiful city in the world Rio de Janeiro! Where we meet, not only with the love stories of heroes during the holidays, but also with the bandits and crooks, and visit the richest world-famous city neighborhood of the poor. All of these unique attractions of Rio disclosed in the film at 100 percent, but the most important thing that is transmitted is a romantic atmosphere of this city! Where the streets sounds like bossa-nova, also one of the most beautiful waterfronts of the world go to the incredible beauty, our feet washed by the warm ocean, and all this heaven protects the majestic statue of Jesus. Despite of the fear of heights Marcelo Cerrado with Ryan Kvantenom climbed the mountain called Sugarloaf during the filming. The actors were resorted to use the steel cables that have been cut during the post-production.
The story based on the Hualend’s family life what looks like perfect for the first sight. But soon, everything will start to fall apart. Alice Howland is a well-known professor of linguistics, she knows a thousands of words and understands them like no one better. Her marriage is stunning, she has a loving husband and three grown children. What else she can wish to have in her age? It seems to be nothing but strange thing has happened, Alice began to forget the words. They are gradually moving out of her head, and soon a woman has sounded the alarm. When Alice went to the doctor, he notices the Alzheimer’s disease. Soon Alice will forget everything. Even her children and her husband. For Alice is a disaster, at first she did not want to tell anyone, but it becomes obvious. How will the live our heroine spring now? She decides to enjoy life for the last moments, before she had not yet forgotten all the most valuable things in human life…
The main character is Maya. She is a hardworking kind bee, which is opening a whole word to herself. As usual, voyages and discoveries always related with the adventures …
The movie again takes us back to a favorite bee Maya. But now cartoon was greatly changed by new special effects and recognitions. Indescribable nature’s beauty and all the kindest thing that you can imagine can be seen here. The main characters are Bee Maya and Willie who is her best friend. They are funny as always, but in this cartoon they are made more colorful and perky, making movie viewing more interesting. The plot is not changed much but this cartoon contains the most wonderful features, only kindness overwhelms it.
He did not impress you with what – something new, believe me. And wait for the return of the landmark Turtles – mutants is not necessary. But I felt nostalgic. Weaknesses in the tape of course there are but not so disgusting as many say. The film proved to be a pretty confident at the box office. This is due to good advertising, the world famous heroes and, oddly enough, Megan Fox. Something tells me that among the audience were indifferent to her delicious ass, which so ably advertised in the trailers. In general, such a platter looks at least funny. I’ll wait for the sequel. Especially apparently there will add more characters known to us. And if not stingy, and raise the bar of the budget, grind the script and add any – any effects.
“Nymphomaniac” left quite a changeable impression . It seems both history thoroughly and seriously, the full history of human life, but at the same time and fun, almost banter, sarcasm, irony, – I can not find the exact word. Von Trier wanted to make a film about sex. And he took it off. Took off well, how could, took a multifaceted film, leaving a strange aftertaste. I do not know what and how to think about it, because my impression is changing depending on which angle I look at that. As in the movie spot of tea on the wall of the main character suddenly saw a gun. On the one hand, I see a solid work where there isn’t literary basis, adjusted and accurate to the last detail, almost makes cry of delight.
The film tells us about the adventures of a small detachment of the Vikings on Scottish soil. Very charismatic young leader, once with his countrymen in a foreign country, decides to spend his unit to the nearest Viking settlement. On the way they face a lot of trouble.Costumes in the film are made good. The Vikings are consistent with historical account, but with the Scots and their mercenaries somehow with some eastern lands they made up a little. Some unimaginable armor, I can even say as a fantasy. Beautiful scenery pleasing to the eye throughout the viewing. Fighting delivered good, no blood splatters liters in all directions. There are no vulgarity and stupidity. In general, the film turned out good enough spectacular, breathtaking developing story.
Christophe Gans is trying to combine a fabulous convention and historical realities of the XVIII century, without relying at recreating all the familiar story, perhaps, nothing and no one else, until a certain time and making all morality in the film is too fragile and ephemeral. The main result of the new “Beauty and the Beast” in essence becomes a fact that the film seems to be completely out of the genre, not having truly attractive proportion of bright fairytale narrative, not solid historicism (all historical and social aspect in the film enjoyed a very superficial), which would be compensated complete absence in the film unshakable and enduring sincerity. And in fact through the film permeates only one single sound idea that the love of monsters still required, even if it is only the love of convenience.
The first vampire who gave the initial impetus to the eternal theme of immortality vampirism. You know, the theme of vampires for me has always been relevant and interesting, because in the late 19th century writer with a brilliant imagination to create a creature that does not know how to grow old, to be forever young and beautiful, but lives at the expense of the lives of others by drinking their blood. For me has always been interesting to watch as the man who became an immortal monster forced to eat other people’s lives, will behave. How much has already been filmed on the subject of movies? Hard to say, now the genre is at the pinnacle of success and is incredibly popular in general, turned out a great movie with an interesting plot and intriguing characters are well spelled out, except for a few. So far this is the best film about Dracula that I’ve ever seen.
The plot in the first half of the picture read, but more what happens is that it did not fit. The promise of this is given in the beginning of the film, but it does not attach importance in the process of watching a movie about it, I had forgotten – so I tightened the story. And here, I must say, hiding one thing that prevented me to put the film the highest rating. Just the first half of the film, albeit with a readable story, but shot so powerful and heartfelt, with such attention to detail and with such a strong feeling that it simply can not leave the viewer indifferent. But then, in my opinion, one storyline is interrupted and another begins. Even if it is linked to the end of the film, but still it looks somewhat aloof. And for such an eventuality, I was not ready. It seemed to me that the emotion at the end of the film was less and sensuality was also less. It seems the filmmakers did not consider that the audience give everything for the first storyline, and the second may not be enough of us. Perhaps the thing in the game Jennifer Connelly and Ripley.
Decision to base the story biblical story is a very bold and ambitious. But the writers, in my opinion, acted very competently. betraying not a literal retelling, but rather a variation on the theme of the Flood. Do not expect from the picture following the canons of the genre, which were laid at the dawn of cinema. This film is different slant fantasy rather than a historical genre. Really liked the fact that the film seriously affected by the problem of the survival of the human race, and in the course of the narrative put quite a logical question: how reasonable saving a species which is so prone to parasitism and self-destruction? The question is really hard, but the writers quite gracefully beat it and add a conflict between belief in the depravity of mankind Noah and his wife’s charity, accustomed to see the best in people. And the outcome of this conflict, I personally liked.
